|
People suffer and die
because the government "protects" us. It should protect us less and
respect our liberty more.
The most basic
questions are: Who owns you, and who should control what you put into
your body? In what sense are you free if you can't decide what medicines
you will take?
This will be the
subject of my Fox Business program tomorrow night.
We'll hear from
people like Bruce Tower. Tower has prostate cancer. He wanted to take a
drug that showed promise against his cancer, but the Food and Drug
Administration would not allow it. One bureaucrat told him the
government was protecting him from dangerous side effects. Tower's
outraged response was: "Side effects -- who cares? Every treatment I've
had I've suffered from side effects. If I'm terminal, it should be my
option to endure any side effects."
Of course it
should be his option. Why, in our "free" country, do Americans meekly
stand aside and let the state limit our choices, even when we are dying?
Dr. Alan Chow
invented a retinal implant that helps some blind people see
(optobionics.com). Demonstrating that took seven years and cost $50
million dollars of FDA-approved tests. But now the FDA wants still more
tests. That third stage will take another three years and cost $100
million. But Chow doesn't have $100 million. He can't raise the money
from investors because the implant only helps some blind people.
Potential investors fear there are too few customers to justify their
$100 million risk.
So Stephen
Lonegan, who has a degenerative eye disease that might be
helped by the implant, can't have it. Instead, he will go blind. The
bureaucrats say their restrictions are for
his own safety. "There's nothing
safe about going blind," he says. "I don't want to be made safe by the
FDA. I want it to be up to me to go to Dr. Chow to make the decision
myself."
But it's not up
to
Lonegan and his doctor. It's up to the autocrats of the
Nanny State. Tomorrow, I will show my confrontation with Terry
Toigo
of the FDA about that. She calmly and quietly explained that such
restrictions are necessary to protect the integrity of the government's
safety review process until I shouted: "Why are you even involved? Let
people try things!"
She replied, "We
don't think that's the best system for patients, to enable people to
just take whatever they want with little information available about a
drug."
So people suffer
and die when they might have lived longer, more comfortable lives.
The FDA's
intrusion on our freedom is supplemented by another agent of the Nanny
State. The Drug Enforcement Agency's war on drug dealers has led them to
watch pain-management doctors like hawks. Drugs like
Vicodin and
OxyContin provide wonderful pain relief. But because they
are also taken by "recreational" drug users, doctors go to jail for
prescribing quantities that the DEA considers "inappropriate." As a
result, pain specialists are scared into
underprescribing
painkillers. Sick people suffer horrible pain needlessly.
Think I
exaggerate? Check out the website of the American Association of
Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). It warns doctors not to go into pain
management. "Drug agents now set medical standards. ... There could be
years of harassment and legal fees," says the AAPS. Today, even
nursing-home patients, hardly candidates for drug gangs, don't get pain
relief they need.
The DEA told us
that good doctors have nothing to worry about. But Siobhan Reynolds, who
started the Pain Relief Network (painreliefnetwork.org) after her late
husband was unable to get sufficient pain medicine, says the
DEA's
cherry-picked medical experts persuade juries that they should jail any
doctor who administers higher doses of pain relief than the
DEA's
zealots think appropriate. News of those jail terms spreads. Doctors
learn to be stingy with paid meds.
All drugs
involve risk. In a free country, it should be up to individuals, once
we're adults, to make our own choices about those risks. Patrick Henry
didn't say, "Give me absolute safety, or give me death." He said
"liberty." That is what America is supposed to be about.
John Stossel hosts "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the
author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright
Stupidity."
|