Natchez Mayor Butch
Brown surprised aldermen by announcing the city would like to end its
participation in Metro Narcotics.
Look at the claim that conservatives
or Republicans have launched a war on women as a part of their overall
The Miss-Lou’s breaking news:
Alyssa Standeford, 26, of Adams
County, pled guilty to manslaughter and
received 10 years in prison with five years to serve and another five
years suspended.... Two men were arrested in Ferriday after they fought over
a bottle of vodka.... Former administrators of the Natchez-Adams County
Schools have filed suit against the district....
The Advice Goddess:
Though her boyfriend appreciates her
openness, he keeps telling his sweetie there's a line between expressiveness
and making everything an emotional issue to be hashed out.
Terry Savage on money:
The future can seem so far away -- and
the path to that future so unsure -- that it can be difficult to know
exactly how much to save or even to find the motivation to get started.
McAllister on health:
Unless you've ever observed a sow
rooting for a truffle, you might not fully appreciate the power of
pheromones. One tantalizing whiff of the truffle scent transforms a normally
placid creature into a love-crazed maniac.
Thomas Sowell thinking clearly:
Painful as it is to realize that both the Democrats and the Republicans will
still be holding their primaries a year from now, that is one of the high
prices we pay for democracy.
Best buys classifieds:
Classifieds work. Get
your best deals here. Read our latest classified listings.
Tourists and pilgrims welcome:
The weather is beautiful in Natchez and Vidalia. It's
the perfect time of year to schedule a visit to the River Cities.
Win cash or prizes!
Lee Evans of Natchez won $500 in cash from Miss-Lou
Magazine and The Natchez Sun.
More good writing:
Find more local news on
www.natchezsunxpress.com. Plus additional editorial commentary, features and
cartoons. Look for Michael Barone and Michelle Malkin's latest columns.
Information sellers still searching
by Charlie Mitchell
That’s what a newspaper in
Canada has decided to charge per story for viewers who visit its digital
edition and scroll around for news and information.
Customers will create an
account. Their selections will be tracked, and their credit cards will be
charged for each click.
The name of the Winnipeg newspaper is the Free Press.
But no press is free. Those who
gather “content” (a loathsome word to journalists) must eat, pay rent and
car notes just as other humans do. They like to get paid.
By now, we all know the financial arrangement that sustained
print and broadcast media companies for many decades has been diluted. The
major source of money for media operations came from advertisers who found
it beneficial to piggyback their messages with news and entertainment.
As more and more people shop online for jobs, homes, cars,
clothing and other consumer needs, advertisers’ dollars are being spent more
Media companies created and keep ramping up their Internet
offerings, but the advertising hasn’t followed — at least not dollar for
dollar. Think about it. When a shopper is looking for, say, a ladder, the
shopper visit websites of stores that sell ladders. Stores have a
diminishing need to pay media outlets to tout their products.
So, for at least 15 years, media companies have been casting
about for other revenue streams.
One approach by newspapers and magazines has been to increase
subscription prices. Not too long ago, newspapers sold for a quarter. Now,
some are $2 per copy.
When media companies started websites, the vast majority
imposed no fees or charges of any type. Circulation directors complained
about this, pointing out it was not easy to sell a product to some people
while others were getting it free, but “free news” became the expectation of
Gradually, print media companies inflicted “pay walls” on
readers. They vary greatly, some offering a little time on the site before a
person is told to pay or go away. Others say “pay or go away” immediately.
All sorts of consequences ensued. For one thing, there was
public outrage over being “gouged” by “greedy” media companies. For another,
there are so many alternative sources. If a person who wants to know the
score of last night’s baseball game visits the local newspaper website and
hits a pay wall, the person can click away and find the score someone else …
Twitter, the school website … tons of “free” options. A media company can’t
really expect a person to pay unless there is exclusive “content” a viewer
really wants to see.
Now along with all of this, major changes have evolved in how
consumers do their research and make their buying decisions. People tend to
want facts, especially for major purchases. They don’t really care whether
they are looking at information offered by a manufacturer (formerly called
advertising copy) or by a neutral product reviewer. People will read
articles and customer comments about resorts or cars or exercise equipment
to get the information they seek, and they really don’t care who wrote it.
Where is all of this going?
The only thing that can be said for sure is that the demand
for news and information and entertainment is increasing exponentially.
The Winnipeg Free Press is not the first to come up with a
pay-per-story approach. Some companies actually extend this thinking and, in
turn, pay writers based on how mant readers they attract. If no one reads an
article, the journalist is paid nothing. If millions do, the journalist gets
a big, fat check. As has happened with other experiments, others will mimic
and modify to see what, if anything, gets traction.
As indicated, the key is high-quality, exclusive news and
information that people want. But sometimes budgeteers can’t wrap their
spreadsheets around that simple fact.
In the interim, there is hope. People do change their
habits and their thinking over time.
Some of us are old enough to remember the ironclad fact
in American society that television and radio were free. In the early days
of cable the mere notion of paying $3.50 per month to get a few more
channels was an option only for the wealthy. Today, as we know, most
households pay $100 to $200 or more monthly for the opportunity to watch
“Duck Dynasty” 24/7.
But cable, satellite and Internet TV are being challenged,
Who will be paid how much for what remains an open question.
Charlie Mitchell is a Mississippi journalist. Write to him at